Evaluation Repository Search
Thursday, 04 September 2014

Kitchen Garden pilot program evaluation

Kitchen Garden Pilot Prog


Authors: Meg Dione-Rodgers, Susan Harriman, Sally Blackwell, Michael Costello and Barry Laing

Evaluator Company/Business: Quality Assurance, Policy Planning and Reporting Unit, NSW Department of Education

Year: 2013

URL or PDF: Download the Kitchen Garden evaluation (PDF, 1.47MB).

Summary:  The evaluation aimed to determine the effectiveness of the implementation and the impact of the program on student learning in nine metropolitan schools in the second year of pilot program. The study also sought to identify the professional learning programs and other resources that may be needed to support and sustain future programs. The evaluation employed a mixed method design using interviews with school principals and staff, students and parents, classroom observations, an online teacher survey and document review. The authors found that the program had positive outcomes: improving student engagement, particularly for students with special needs; developing student leadership skills and improved student learning about garden maintenance and healthy foods. Another key finding was that teachers placed high value on embedding the program in the school curriculum and generally believed that the program was sustainable.  

Additional Info

  • Year: 2013
  • Classification: Other Evidence
  • Study Type: Expert opinion
  • Evaluation Type: Both process and outcome

The evidence hierarchy

EH 2

The evidence hierarchy is used to classify each evaluation.


If you find a CESE publication is not accessible, please contact us.