Publications filter

Evaluation of the Y-PEP a child protection program in schools (PDF, 1.7MB)

Authors: Ernst & Young

Evaluator company/business: Ernst & Young

Year: 2018

URL or PDF: Evaluation of the Y-PEP a child protection program in schools (PDF, 1.7MB)

Summary: The aim of the evaluation was to understand the extent to which the Y-PEP program, delivered by the Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA), was supporting the delivery of child protection education in NSW government and non-government schools. The Y-PEP program started in 2016 and was set to end in late 2019. Ernst & Young (EY) began and completed the evaluation in 2018.

The evaluation used a mixed-methods approach, which consisted of analysing quantitative program data (school demographic data; student and teacher feedback survey data; and quarterly program data, as collected by YWCA) and qualitative data (data from semi-structured interviews of stakeholders at participating schools, as conducted by EY).

The evaluation questions aimed to understand the extent to which the Y-PEP program:

  • provided appropriate delivery of child protection education to students
  • had been effectively implemented and delivered to students
  • had impacts on students' and teachers' child protection knowledge.

The evaluation found that the Y-PEP program:

  • was an appropriate method for delivering child protection education to students
  • was effectively implemented and delivered to schools, but had some scope for improvement
  • was having positive impacts on students’ and teachers’ awareness of child protection education.

 


 We are committed to providing accessible content for all users. To request an accessible version of this context, please contact us.

Published in Evaluation repository

Evaluation of the Rural and Remote Education Blueprint - final report (PDF, 2MB)

Authors: Andrew Griffiths, Ian Watkins, Francis Matthew-Simmons, Sasindu Gamage

Evaluator company/business: Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation

Year: 2020

URL or PDF: Evaluation of the Rural and Remote Education Blueprint

Summary: This final evaluation report examines the implementation and impact of actions contained in the Blueprint. It also examines important education performance indicators to assess any changes in the magnitude of the gaps between rural and remote students and metropolitan students since the launch of the Blueprint. We collected a range of qualitative and quantiative data sources to evaluate the Blueprint including interviews, surveys and administrative data. This evaluation has found that:

  • Gaps in NAPLAN scores and school attendance between rural and remote students and metropolitan students have not reduced since the introduction of the blueprint. The gaps between remote students and metropolitan students have narrowed on Best Start and retention to Year 12.
  • The 50% rental subsidy introduced at some fourpoint schools had no meaningful impact on teacher retention.
Published in Evaluation repository

 LowSES Staff Mngmnt Accnt FinalRpt 

Evaluator company/business: Victoria University, Centre for International Research on Education Systems

Year: 2015

URL or PDF: Download the low socioeconomic status school communities Smarter Schools National Partnership - Evaluation of staffing, management and accountability initiatives final report (PDF, 1.38MB).

Summary: This report investigates the implementation, effectiveness and sustainability of initiatives within five reform areas of the low socioeconomic school communities National Partnership (Low-SES NP) dealing with school staffing, management and accountability. A key question for the evaluation is whether or not participation in the Low-SES NP has helped improve the education and life opportunities of students from low socioeconomic status backgrounds through improvements in student outcomes. To examine this question, a range of analyses were undertaken using available data, including NAPLAN results. The analysis suggests that there has been some impact from the Low-SES NP and affirms some of the positive responses found in both principal and staff surveys on effects of the program, including in areas of student outcomes.

Published in Evaluation repository

Lit Num NP Prog Eval Focus On Reading 

Authors: Alison Wallace, Benita Power, Lee Holloway, Chloe Harkness
Evaluator Company/Business:
Urbis 
Year:
2012
URL or PDF: 
Download the External evaluation of the selected NPLN NSW Programs: Evaluation of Focus on Reading 3-6 final report (PDF, 1.5MB) 
Summary:
The evaluation aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Focus on Reading 3-6 program, to identify the extent to which the program was operating as intended and to assess whether the program had improved the educational outcomes of Aboriginal students. Focus on Reading 3-6 was designed to provide professional learning support to classroom teachers in a school or community of schools. The main goals of the program were to increase teacher knowledge about how to develop fluent readers and to develop  comprehension and vocabulary skills based on effective evidence-based practices. The evaluation methodology comprised a knowledge review, scoping of data sets, site visits, and stakeholder interviews and surveys. In both the quantitative and qualitative research, the great majority of teachers and school staff reported increased knowledge and skills in teaching reading. Gains in mean reading scores were also observed for all student cohorts at Focus on Reading 3-6 schools.

Published in Evaluation repository
Tuesday, 12 September 2017

Effective leadership - audio paper

 

Principals have a substantial impact on student outcomes.

This audio paper outlines the research evidence on what makes an effective principal and the best ways to identify, develop and support aspiring school principals.

Read by Rachel Smith, CESE.

Read our full paper on Effective leadership.

Connected Communities Strategy Interim Rpt

Author: Andrew Goodall

Evaluator company/business: Internal to DoE - Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation

Year: 2015
URL or Pdf: Download the Connected Communities Strategy - Interim Evaluation Report (Pdf, 2.25MB)
Summary: This report presents findings about the implementation of the Connected Communities Strategy and early impacts on student indicators. The findings were informed by site visits to all 15 participating school communities, reviews of program documentation and analysis of administrative data. The findings indicate that there had been many positive changes at Connected Communities schools but that several key features of the Strategy were yet to be implemented according to the original intent. There was also minimal evidence of any improvements in student outcomes, although it was acknowledged that it was too early to draw conclusions about the impact of the Strategy in this area.

Published in Evaluation repository

 Reading Recovery Sector-wide Analysis 2015

Authors: Deborah Bradford and Wai-Yin Wan
Evaluator company/business: Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, NSW Department of Education

Year: 2015
URL or PDF: Download Reading Recovery: a sector-wide analysis  (PDF, 1.23MB).
Summary: The primary aims of this study were to examine the impact of Reading Recovery (RR) on students’ literacy outcomes at the end of Year 1 and whether any benefits associated with participating in RR are sustained over the longer term to Year 3. This evaluation was conducted state-wide across NSW government schools. It focussed on identifying the impact of RR on student outcomes compared to similar students who attended a school that did not offer RR. The study employed a quasi-experimental design drawing on retrospective data that detailed participation in RR and student outcomes in the early years of school. The results showed some evidence that RR has a modest short-term effect on reading skills among the lowest performing students. However, RR does not appear to be an effective intervention for students that begin Year 1 with more proficient literacy skills. In the longer-term, there was no evidence of any positive effects of RR on students’ reading performance in Year 3.

Published in Evaluation repository
Monday, 29 February 2016

Does changing school matter?

LC 13

 

Does changing school matter? (PDF 1MB) explores student mobility in NSW government schools and the impact mobility has on student outcomes.

Published in Learning Curve
Monday, 14 December 2015

Reading Recovery evaluation

This evaluation (PDF, 1.8MB) examined the impact of Reading Recovery (RR) on students' outcomes in NSW government schools. The evaluation found some evidence that RR has a modest short-term effect on reading skills among the lowest performing students. However, RR does not appear to be an effective intervention for students that begin Year 1 with more proficient literacy skills. In the longer-term, there was no evidence of any positive effects of RR on students' reading performance in Year 3.

Related: Learning Curve 11 - Reading Recovery

Published in Research report

Reading Recovery: A sector-wide analysis (PDF, 1MB)

Reading Recovery: A sector-wide analysis (PDF, 1MB) briefly describes the results of an evaluation examining the impact of Reading Recovery on students' outcomes in NSW government schools. You can also read the Reading Recovery evaluation. 

Published in Learning Curve
Page 1 of 3

Publications advanced search

Accessible documents

If you find a CESE publication is not accessible, please contact us

Waratah-NSWGovt-Reverse