Authors: Andrew Griffiths, Ian Watkins, Francis Matthew-Simmons, Stephen Summerlin
Evaluator company/business: Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation
URL or PDF: Connected Communities Strategy evaluation report
Summary: The final evaluation report examined the implementation and impact of the Connected Communities Strategy.
The report drew on a wide range of data, including school and stakeholder interviews, student performance data (attendance, NAPLAN, retention to Year 12, HSC) and survey data (Tell Them From Me, Post-School Destinations and Expectations and a bespoke survey for parents/carers and teachers).
Overall, Connected Communities is showing promising results. Connected Communities has had a positive impact in schools, particuarly in outcomes for students in their early years. The strategy appears to be more effective at the primary level than the secondary level. The primary school cohort of students who have been 'fully exposed' to Connected Communities for their entire time at school appear to be showing the greatest benefit from the strategy in terms of NAPLAN results, and appear to be more developmentally ready for school than earlier cohorts. Further time will be required to see if the results in later years improve as this cohort of students continues through its schooling.
Both implementation and outcomes have varied across individual schools. The buy-in of all staff remains key to the successful implementation of Connected Communities.
Authors: Shuyan Huo, Stephen Lamb
Evaluator company/business: Centre for International Research in Education Systems (CIRES)
URL or PDF: Download the report on Effective strategies for improving student learning: results from the low SES NP evaluation (PDF, 1.41MB)
Summary: This report was prepared by CIRES at Victoria University and is part of the evaluation of the National Partnership reform initiatives in low socioeconomic status (SES) school communities. The report focuses on student performance in the low SES schools in NSW that participated in the National Partnership agreements, and the extent to which changes in student performance are related to National Partnership initiatives or other factors; and the initiatives that may be identified as making the strongest contributions to changes in student outcomes.
Authors: Ann Daly, Meg Dione-Rodgers, Robyn Leggatt, Brendt Evenden
Evaluator company/business: School Policy and Information Management Unit, NSW Department of Education
URL or PDF: Download the Report on Cooks Hill Campus - Implementation of big picture education philosophy and design (PDF, 1.06MB)
Summary: The Big Picture Education Australia (BPEA) philosophy and design was implemented in the Cooks Hill Campus of Newcastle High School in 2014. In 2015, the department commenced an evaluation of the initiative's key features: personalised learning; learning through leadership; and authentic assessment. The evaluation adopted a mixed methods approach, including observations, surveys, and analysis of school administrative and achievement data. It found that the school community was very supportive of the initiative, and that it had a positive impact on teacher practices and student attitudes, behaviour and performance.
Drivers of school improvement are often complex and context specific. This publication describes the effective practices common to NSW government schools that achieved high growth in NAPLAN over a sustained period. These schools are defined as ‘High Value-Add’ (HVA) schools.
Effective collaboration is considered vital to driving whole-school improvement. It includes teachers sharing work samples to ensure consistency in teacher judgement, developing easily accessible platforms to share teaching resources and using peer coaching and support programs to promote and develop effective teaching practice.
Professional learning needs to support strategic school goals and be shared among staff so that learning is embedded across the school. It includes using staff meetings as a platform to share learning and internal expertise, having peer supports to ensure that professional learning is applied and obtaining tangible skills and materials for the classroom.
Educators need to work together and set shared goals for effective change to occur. This includes having whole-school planning days and regular staff meetings to discuss, support and evaluate progress towards achieving goals.
Showing students what success looks like and breaking down the steps required to achieve success is an important teaching strategy in high growth schools. Other strategies include using student data to identify students’ learning needs, developing learning targets and monitoring progress and developing accessible teaching resources that include templates for how to differentiate lessons and assessments.
Promoting a positive learning culture where students are engaged in school and value their outcomes is key to improving school performance. This includes using innovative teaching techniques, teaching students about literacy and numeracy through real-world examples such as transport, and organising trips to local universities for students and parents to help raise expectations about future study.
Creating high expectations for students, both academically and behaviourally, is essential to improving student performance. This could include displaying learning progressions in classrooms to show students what performance benchmarks are and having a common set of guidelines across a school that rewards positive behaviour.
For more information on how we selected HVA schools for this study, read High value-add schools: Key drivers of school improvement.
All educators strive to lift the achievement of their students. Educational researchers aim to assist in this effort by identifying the initiatives that are most likely to yield sustainable improvements in student performance.
This study aims to examine the key drivers of improvement in NSW government schools that have shown high growth in student outcomes over time. High growth schools were identified using a robust value-added methodology that isolates the contribution that a school makes to growth in student achievement while controlling for important contextual factors that may influence student performance.
Identifying high performing schools is an important step in developing the evidence base about “what works” to
improve educational outcomes for students.